this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
197 points (96.7% liked)

Canada

7168 readers
358 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It costs a lot of money, this money comes from your taxes, it affects your life

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$1.55 per Canadian per year? Seriously?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sixty million a year could build multiple public housing projects, every year. And on the other side of the balance scale is Charles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would still need an executive position. There would be no savings.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In fact, if Canada goes with a "President," it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn't it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is it costing us 60 million a year? Majority is Governor General. Well we still need that position it well just be named President of something. So don't see how it well save any money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You know it wouldn't be, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's maybe enough for one 100 unit building a year, depending on where it's built, which is something but so far from anything substantial.

Building is fucking expensive right now even if the province uses paramountcy to bypass municipal zoning. Plus, the province sucks ass at building compared to private because its gov't. That's not too say I don't support massive amounts of public housing being built because I do 100%, but gov't is gov't.