you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 3 days ago (16 children)

The things I've heard as a pale person even in a professional environment, where if you would simply swap "white" to "black", "pale" to "dark" would get you fired on the spot. But for some reason, commenting on someone's skin color if they're pale is perfectly socially acceptable, encouraged even since it often gets a laugh from others.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago*

    As a very pale person who was bullied a lot for it and probably has lasting personal doubt from that bullying, I think there is just a fundamental difference (in the US). One is "just" mean and bullying, but there is no horrific dehumanizing history behind it. Both are bad, but I don't think they're directly substitutable in the way you describe, as I think it cheapens the history of slavery and racism

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

    Probably because the entire western world didn't systematically buy and enslave kidnapped pale people, treat them as subhuman and breed them like livestock - so it's not as touchy a subject.

    Edit: Guess that's still a touchy subject. You wanted an answer for why it's still socially acceptable to joke about pale skin but not dark skin, and that's pretty obviously the answer why it's not the same thing.

    Or maybe the downvotes are because the breeding only happened in the Southern US and French, German, British, Australian, and Belgian lemmies don't wanna get roped in on that specific colonial history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Not even that, colorism is prevalent globally--whiter skin privilege exists pretty much around the world. Look at mass media from Mexico and India and you'll see a bunch of people who are several shades lighter than the majority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Because skin tone still relates to status, pale equals you can stay inside rather than in the field.

    Meanwhile in Northern Europe tan is status, as it indicates you can be in the sun outside rather than stuck in the office

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    The uncorfortableness around the skin color of "colored" people has to do with their oppression at the hands of white people. It not about their skin color more about their oppression

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Yes! Most "white" people are in fact light brown. They cannot stand being around anybody different.

    I'm mostly pink with some blue, and I heard all about it in high school. Later, in college (uni) I got over it because my punk, goth, and Black friends didn't care. But man those "white" girls in high school were rotten.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    Poor white people, they have it so hard. 😞

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments