you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

"We weren't trying to make a political statement," Smith reportedly said. "However, we were, you know, kind of poking fun at the fact that you know one of the Great Lakes' names were getting changed."

Lives in Michigan. Intentionally modified a family photo to have them all in “Lake America” shirts. Then posted it publicly specifically calling out that Canadians wouldn’t like it, and laughing about that.

Some people seem pretty unaware of what a political statement is.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 43 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

    She sounds like one of those conservatives that is just fine with lording it over others when donnie is doing something terrible to other people, but then acts all hurt when people decided to cut ties with them: "why did they have to do this? All over politics? They cannot still just get along?"

    Yeah, they love to pretend to not know that nearly everything is "politics" and they act totally hurt and confused when they get any consequences for their behaviors and their choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

    It's the same people that will say something wildly racist or bigoted. Then complain that you can't take a joke if you call them out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

    Someone at work kept pretending he didn't understand how people were telling him he was using company equipment to send out political content and to not do it again.

    What he sent out via work email was a calculator on what the typical taxpayer could expect to pay for some measure on the ballot. People kept explaining to him that what he was sharing is inherently one-sided. You are only telling people what that measure would (allegedly) cost, without explaining how that would benefit society, or individuals, or their kids. Not only that, but the supposed math on that cost and the veracity and good faith of the site itself? Who knows.

    He kept saying if people want to understand how it may benefit (which he would sarcastically intone when spoken - the scare quotes were there every single time he said it) they could read the ballot measure, since it explains what it does, but people should know what it would cost them.

    He couldn't understand that the dry language on the ballot is not really explaining all the potential upsides to society in general, etc.

    I'm sure you could already guess that he's a conservative and voted R all the time...he was completely outraged when people asked him to provide something that explained how the measure would do good things. Suddenly, his gaslighting pretense of merely being "apolitical" and "just providing tools that give people data" fell to pieces. He had zero interest in providing any data on the upsides. Weird how that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    I think conservatives genuinely believe that they are normal and anyone who objects to anything they say or do is political.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    You are absolutely correct. They think any deviation from their norm is radical socialism. It's why they think they're not homophobic as long as nothing is actively being the slightest bit gay. If it's out of their comfort zone, even slightly, it's "wrong"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 5 points 6 hours ago*

    Probably explains why they have been absolutely serious, for decade upon decade, in claiming that "liberal media" is a thing. The con has their positions on things, and they are far to the right on the broader political spectrum, and the American spectrum as well.

    When the "liberal media" reiterates all the right wing assumptions about the world, they don't notice or think it is "political". The minute they report something factual that conflicts with their extremist position, then that's "political".

  • source
  • parent