you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 8 hours ago* (2 children)

Did somebody actually say tanks were dead after WWI? Tanks were brand new!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Yes, in fact, some people at the time declared the tank dead for the first time. Trench warfare was a thing of the past, and so the question arose as to why we would still need a vehicle that had only proven its worth through trench warfare (the first tanks were designed to break through heavy defenses and, in particular, to eliminate machine-gun nests).

    These commentators were even correct in that the subsequent wars were no longer trench wars, and the tank diversified beyond its role as a breakthrough vehicle, evolving (among other things) into a system of one-on-one combat over the course of the next major war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

    Wow, so I guess they were picturing everything reverting back to 19th-century warfare? Or maybe, they were picturing what actually happened, but they didn't know what to call the heavy, but still fast and maneuverable, gun platforms we now call "tanks".

    I guess it goes to show that you have to consider what a new military technology adds, as well as what it subtracts.

  • source
  • parent