this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
351 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
3057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's only with the artist's agreement though isn't it? Usually because you're paying them. In this case the artist isn't a person so can't grant you the copyright (I think)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not.

Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Then it's public domain according to cases so far.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's called work for hire, if you're employed to do something then you have to agree who gets the copyright before you do the work.

AI art isn't copyrightable because it's the output of a mathematical equation and most sane places decided your can't copyright math - imagine if Microsoft had been able to lock down percentages and no one else was allowed to use them, or of if every bit of electronics had to use sub-optimal voltage values because apple were sitting on a patent blocking people from using the most efficient options.

Copyright was only really invented so the rich can block people from expressing themselves and allow them to manipulate society, it so goes back to when queen Elizabeth decided that her friend should be the only person allowed to make money from salt, a commodity we'd been using for tens of thousands of years at that point. It's all rent seeking and attacks on the poor.