As a sweaty loser, all my adult life if I had to emit a document I either used LaTeX or Pandoc (which also uses LaTeX). LaTeX is its own can of worms (strange syntax, unwelcoming for newcomers, not easy to install, etc.) but if it's weird, it's weird in a way that I can wrap my head around.

For a group project we are using Microsoft Word, the online version, because I don't have it in me to extol the virtues of LaTeX or Typst to non-tech people. We are using the online version because of the collaboration thing also because no one wants to buy Office.

It's such a strange piece of software. Like what I am trying to do right now is this: semantically designate headings and subheadings to automatically number them and generate a table of content. But it just won't work and I have no idea why because it doesn't say anything.

When I am trying to number headings manually, it sees and understands what my intention it and turns into a numbered list, changes the number to "1.". To work around this I have to add "a6." then remove the "a".

I am sure that Word veterans are horrified that I am doing everything wrong. I am accept your accusations with humility and grace. But I just want to be done with.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 week ago* (4 children)

No no, you're doing it wrong. If you make headings by just changing font sizes, Word will have no idea what you actually want.

In Word, you need to edit the default font sizes of the heading options shown in the ribbon, then apply them to the lines you want the headings to be by highlighting the text, then clicking the desired heading option in the ribbon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    This did not work for me probably because of using the online version as you said. I used the styles option for the but the ToC generation and proper number just doesn't happen. I get what you mean though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    I see, yeah Word Online feels lobotomized and sucks.

    Also why are y'all using Word online instead of Google Docs for collaboration? In terms of features, Word desktop > Google Docs > Word online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's the fault of a teammate. I don't know why he chose to be weird about it. The university gives us a G**gle account so the first choice was a google doc. But first he made a notion thing (don't know what they call it). Then he made a publicly editable document on Office online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    Word is one of the worst things ever for collaboration. Online version sucks, and desktop version is very bad for this purpose. Also make sure everybody has the exact same version if you ever use the Desktop app, since it's very easy to break the formatting when sending the file from one person to the other.

  • source
  • parent