you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 85 points 1 day ago (22 children)

In that case, Diamantoni, a Republican elected coroner in 2007, attributed the death directly to measles.

Why the fuck are coroners aligned with political parties?

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 day ago (16 children)

    When it's an elected position it kinda becomes inevitable. Same with sheriffs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 day ago* (12 children)

    The real question is, why the fuck are coroners elected?

    (Or sheriffs, for that matter.)

    BTW, judges are also often elected, but those elections are required to be nonpartisan. I mean, you could probably figure out which party the judge sympathized with if you tried, but there's no party affiliation listed on the ballot, at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago* (7 children)

    The real question is, why the fuck are coroners elected?

    Before you get too concerned, coroners are politicians. Medical Examiners are the ones that do autopsies on folks that die.

    (Or sheriffs, for that matter.)

    Who would you want appointing the county Sheriff, if not the voters?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Who would you want appointing the county Sheriff, if not the voters?

    In cities, the chief of police is just a normal hired position, right? Why is it important for counties to work differently?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    In a city the chief of police reports to and is accountable the mayor. The major essentially hires and fires the police chief. There is no single analogous county leader for the sheriff to report to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 child)

    Most counties have some kind of executive leadership, same as cities. They tend to control and disperse tax revenue at the county level. Here is one for King county, where Seattle is located.

    The roles can be pretty sparse for smaller population areas, but anyplace that has a sheriff probally has someone in charge of money that pays the sheriff. They could just as easily hire/fire a sheriff, same as a mayor can hire/fire a police chief.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago*

    King county is probably a bad example because of the size of the population and existing government inside the county including overlapping law enforcement with Issaquah, Snoqualmie, Bellevue, and Seattle PD.

    Lets take a small rural county. At random, how about Darke County Ohio (population 51,000). There are a total of 10 elected positions to county government.

    The roles can be pretty sparse for smaller population areas, but anyplace that has a sheriff probally has someone in charge of money that pays the sheriff. They could just as easily hire/fire a sheriff, same as a mayor can hire/fire a police chief.

    With the Darke county example, you want to give the power of law enforcement to the "TREASURER" position. I would be worried a person with finance knowledge may not be skilled in selecting a skilled law enforcement officer. Another worry would be concentrating both county money and legal power in one individual.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Murica. Democracy is greate, move voting is more democracy is more greater.

    There are loads of jobs that are elected that you wouldn't expect over there. it's also why every other year is an election year.

    Or if you count primaries it's every year. They're so busy getting voted in they never have any time to do anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    It's also why so many incompetant people have such important jobs, because people voting don't take the time to vet them properly since there are so many positions to vote on no one can possibly do their due diligence for them all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    I'd love to see their platforms. What a nightmare of a country.

    Edit:

    In most states, coroners are not required to be physicians or forensic pathologists. State law often mandates specific death investigation training for coroners.

    What the fuck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Holeee sheeet! Thats bonkers! I had no idea! Seems kinda important

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I just looked at two states: Alabama and Pennsylvania. Alabama requires a high school diploma. Pennsylvania does not. They do both require a training course.

    These are the people who show up when someone dies and they are not in the care of a doctor. They decide the cause of death, and when autopsies get performed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    As someone who’s voted for coroner before I’ve often thought the same.

    Also sheriff, which is a law enforcement position that does not require any training, just tricking a sufficient number of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I guess I view the police as inherently political so I'm not as surprised there?

    Not that I think medicine is without bias or anything wacky like that but I can't imagine trying to do public health when the info you are being fed is from someone who won a popularity contest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    The worst part about it is that it kinda makes sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments