114
Another one bites the dust - GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding (grapheneos.social)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51749088

GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you're coming from or why you're so incredibly angry with us. It's not justified and does not make sense.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

how can it be secure if there's code that nobody wrote?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Human review and deterministic code analysis, just like with code of any other provenance

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    so as long as there's proper human oversight, ai code doesn't actually compromise the mission of graphene?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Are you asking rhetorically with a specific mission statement in mind that you believe AI code violates? I’m not aware of Graphene’s mission specifically; I am making a general statement about how AI code can be used responsibly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •