Thought today's smbc comic was too funny not to share. Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The argument predates LLMs by decades, and in other forms it has existed for centuries. It doesn't directly corellate to modern LLMs. It is an example of how a mechanism could mimic human intelligence without actually being intelligent. It's a thought experiment. LLMs are not lookup tables, they are neural network based statistical models, but a similar argument can be made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Is there any actual material difference between what they're describing (the computer equivalent of a philosophical zombie, I would say), and a true agi? Their point seems rather vacuous to me (all I did was read the Wikipedia article).

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That's like saying the neural network in your head told you how to respond to my inquiry, so it's not intelligent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Welcome to the wacky world of "is consciousness an illusion, and are we actually deterministic machines" philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Well the neurons themself might be dumb cells, but together they can be quite smart, everyone is trying to draw a line of how many connections when a neural connection becomes sentient if it ever does become at all, which is a century old problem

    Are sparrows conscious? Cockroaches? Elephants?

  • source
  • parent