β² 73 βΌ Steve Wilhite (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 hours ago by GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/70869345 Credit to Jack Scully
[β] smaximov@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Jraphics Interchange Format permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 child) The optimal format for interchanging 256-colour palletised animated images of giraffes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* That would be a gift. permalink fedilink source parent [β] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child) joint pottographics interchange group permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Jay-fog is going to be my new That said itβs still gif (not jiff). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 point 1 hour ago MySQL would love this kind of recognition, instead it just gets turned into "My"SQL. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Davel23@fedia.io 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) The pronunciation of an anagram's component words has no bearing on the anagram's pronunciation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 child) I think that question is best posed to the Joint Photographic Experts Group, better known as "jay-fegg". (For the record, I'm in camp "G as in Graphic", but it's still true that an acronym's source words don't dictate the pronunciation.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 child) The optimal format for interchanging 256-colour palletised animated images of giraffes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* That would be a gift. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child) joint pottographics interchange group permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Jay-fog is going to be my new That said itβs still gif (not jiff). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 point 1 hour ago MySQL would love this kind of recognition, instead it just gets turned into "My"SQL. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Jay-fog is going to be my new That said itβs still gif (not jiff). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 point 1 hour ago MySQL would love this kind of recognition, instead it just gets turned into "My"SQL. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 1 point 1 hour ago MySQL would love this kind of recognition, instead it just gets turned into "My"SQL. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Davel23@fedia.io 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) The pronunciation of an anagram's component words has no bearing on the anagram's pronunciation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 child) I think that question is best posed to the Joint Photographic Experts Group, better known as "jay-fegg". (For the record, I'm in camp "G as in Graphic", but it's still true that an acronym's source words don't dictate the pronunciation.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 child) I think that question is best posed to the Joint Photographic Experts Group, better known as "jay-fegg". (For the record, I'm in camp "G as in Graphic", but it's still true that an acronym's source words don't dictate the pronunciation.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 child) I think that question is best posed to the Joint Photographic Experts Group, better known as "jay-fegg". (For the record, I'm in camp "G as in Graphic", but it's still true that an acronym's source words don't dictate the pronunciation.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child) They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Davel23@fedia.io 1 point 47 minutes ago (1 child) Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 30 minutes ago So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other? permalink fedilink source parent