▲ 141 ▼ The ChatGPT desktop app bundles a full copy of LibreOffice (simonwillison.net) submitted 1 month ago* by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (13 children) No! Will there be consequences? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (7 children) Libreoffice is MPL, which allows distribution alongside proprietary software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (6 children) That's interesting and distressing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent [–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (4 children) No! Anymore questions? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (3 children) Yes, are you including extrajudicial consequences in your answer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) No, do you think guillotines, or is that too old school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out. Edit I broke the line of questions I'm so sorry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago No forgiveness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (7 children) Libreoffice is MPL, which allows distribution alongside proprietary software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (6 children) That's interesting and distressing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (6 children) That's interesting and distressing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (4 children) No! Anymore questions? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (3 children) Yes, are you including extrajudicial consequences in your answer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) No, do you think guillotines, or is that too old school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out. Edit I broke the line of questions I'm so sorry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago No forgiveness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (3 children) Yes, are you including extrajudicial consequences in your answer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) No, do you think guillotines, or is that too old school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out. Edit I broke the line of questions I'm so sorry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago No forgiveness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) No, do you think guillotines, or is that too old school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out. Edit I broke the line of questions I'm so sorry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago No forgiveness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out. Edit I broke the line of questions I'm so sorry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago No forgiveness. permalink fedilink source parent