▲ 141 ▼ The ChatGPT desktop app bundles a full copy of LibreOffice (simonwillison.net) submitted 1 month ago* by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (6 children) That's interesting and distressing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago On what basis did you proclaim "No! Not legal!" if you're now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why? The authors of the software have specifically allowed it to be used in ways like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago I didn't think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) It's the whole issue with copyleft licences. EDIT: non-copyleft permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) What issue are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago BSD licenses, the MIT one and such allow proprietary redistribution, which I find repugnant. Also yeah I wrote this in sleep-deprivation, I should have written "non-copyleft"... permalink fedilink source parent