β² 782 βΌ Real Problem π³οΈββ§οΈ (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 115 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/73045745
[β] stenAanden@feddit.dk 19 points 1 day ago (4 children) The road is made out of women more than men. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago No idea why this is being downvoted. Statistically, women have less wealth and more debt than men. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -4 points 1 day ago* (3 children) Its only in the last 50 years that women have been able to serve in wars. Its only in the last 50 years that most women have been able to find employment in the same spheres as men. Yet, most soldiers are men. Yet in every hard labor industry the majority of employees are men. Most homicide victims are men. Most suicides are men. Now, I will admit that I was tutored under the patriarchy and there may be a discrepancy in my learning. However, it is no difficulty to cite my sources. suicides by sex military by sex Jobs by sex homicides by sex My point is that women have undoubtedly contributed MASSIVELY to human innovation, and have suffered under patriarchal social systems, but by no means is it that the road of capitalism is paved with the bodies of women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 child) Women have physically labored for much of human history. Their efforts haven't been as recognized as much by historians as men's efforts have. That's not to take away from how men have contributed, mind you. But to say that the road to capitalism is not paved with the bodies of women is false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) I completely agree that women have physically labored for much of human history, and also have contributed in equal measure to much of the advances we now take for granted. My comment was not to diminish the suffrage of women under unjust and unequal systems, but to highlight that the majority of fatalities under capitalism are men. Women 100% suffer under capitalism, there is no argument there, and yes their are definitely women in the brick and mortal of the road. The points I made and the sources I linked are specifically in context to the comment saying, "The road is made out of women more than men". If it is not an equal mix, the statistics I have access to would say that men make up the majority of fatalities under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) You are absolutely diminishing women's contributions and also positioning them as less enslaved by capitalism than men. There are many, many ways that capitalism claims lives that aren't from war or construction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago Because women don't die in war. Or fail to receive proper medical treatment due to an establishment that failed to include them in research groups for most of history. Or are victims of domestic violence. And that's just in the western world. permalink fedilink source parent [β] dkppunk@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago Yet in every hard labor industry the majority of employees are I just want to point out that often women are actively pushed out of spaces like this. Ask any woman who has gone into a male dominated field how she is treated. We are often pushed out because of sexism, misogyny, and sexual harassment. Example: I wanted to be an electrician, I was actively working towards that goal. I overheard how another electrician and the job foreman spoke about my body and the nasty things they would do to me if they had the chance when they thought I couldnβt hear them. It was disgusting and made me unsafe in that environment. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) User found: The reason poor men voted for trump ^^ Edit: Oh of fucking course you think Amber Heard was all victim. Jfc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (1 child) The reason poor men voted for trump "Poor men" didn't vote for Trump. People without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump (men and women alike). Even then, the state you're in and your ethnic/religious persuasion was a stronger casual factor. Trump lost in a landslide with poor black and east-asian men, for instance. And he lost on the margin among poor men in the northeast and west coast. Trump actually won with a majority of white women, against Hillary, Biden, and Kamala. This comic neatly illustrates why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) Gee, I wonder if there's a correlation between not being educated and being poor... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Is βpoor people are poor because theyβre stupidβ really the message you want to put out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Ah yes, correlation. The last stop of the fascist mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) really? Women are working the fatal and disgusting physical manual jobs? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children) What else would you describe childbirth as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago (2 children) Tell us where this magical land is where they pay you to have and raise kids. I will move there immediately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not all jobs have salaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) A South Korean firm is offering to pay its workers $75,000 each time they have a baby Hope you like kimchi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not equal to each other? Also raising children should be recognized, but that doesn't necessarily point to a specific sex. Over the last century women didn't quite have the same physical burden men had. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -8 points 1 day ago (2 children) I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isn't getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. Like, I can at least take the carrying of the child for 9 months seriously, but ffs a lady from my nutso church popped a kid out a few hours before Sunday service and she showed up just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Like not as a part of the lifecycle of a mammal, or the job of an obstetrician, but the actual process of giving birth is an activity for hire that is done for lucrative income? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Childbirth is literally referred to as "going into labor". Like, Idk how else you would describe it if not nine months of hard work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Tango@piefed.ca -3 points 1 day ago Prostitution permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago No idea why this is being downvoted. Statistically, women have less wealth and more debt than men. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -4 points 1 day ago* (3 children) Its only in the last 50 years that women have been able to serve in wars. Its only in the last 50 years that most women have been able to find employment in the same spheres as men. Yet, most soldiers are men. Yet in every hard labor industry the majority of employees are men. Most homicide victims are men. Most suicides are men. Now, I will admit that I was tutored under the patriarchy and there may be a discrepancy in my learning. However, it is no difficulty to cite my sources. suicides by sex military by sex Jobs by sex homicides by sex My point is that women have undoubtedly contributed MASSIVELY to human innovation, and have suffered under patriarchal social systems, but by no means is it that the road of capitalism is paved with the bodies of women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 child) Women have physically labored for much of human history. Their efforts haven't been as recognized as much by historians as men's efforts have. That's not to take away from how men have contributed, mind you. But to say that the road to capitalism is not paved with the bodies of women is false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) I completely agree that women have physically labored for much of human history, and also have contributed in equal measure to much of the advances we now take for granted. My comment was not to diminish the suffrage of women under unjust and unequal systems, but to highlight that the majority of fatalities under capitalism are men. Women 100% suffer under capitalism, there is no argument there, and yes their are definitely women in the brick and mortal of the road. The points I made and the sources I linked are specifically in context to the comment saying, "The road is made out of women more than men". If it is not an equal mix, the statistics I have access to would say that men make up the majority of fatalities under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) You are absolutely diminishing women's contributions and also positioning them as less enslaved by capitalism than men. There are many, many ways that capitalism claims lives that aren't from war or construction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago Because women don't die in war. Or fail to receive proper medical treatment due to an establishment that failed to include them in research groups for most of history. Or are victims of domestic violence. And that's just in the western world. permalink fedilink source parent [β] dkppunk@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago Yet in every hard labor industry the majority of employees are I just want to point out that often women are actively pushed out of spaces like this. Ask any woman who has gone into a male dominated field how she is treated. We are often pushed out because of sexism, misogyny, and sexual harassment. Example: I wanted to be an electrician, I was actively working towards that goal. I overheard how another electrician and the job foreman spoke about my body and the nasty things they would do to me if they had the chance when they thought I couldnβt hear them. It was disgusting and made me unsafe in that environment. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 child) Women have physically labored for much of human history. Their efforts haven't been as recognized as much by historians as men's efforts have. That's not to take away from how men have contributed, mind you. But to say that the road to capitalism is not paved with the bodies of women is false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) I completely agree that women have physically labored for much of human history, and also have contributed in equal measure to much of the advances we now take for granted. My comment was not to diminish the suffrage of women under unjust and unequal systems, but to highlight that the majority of fatalities under capitalism are men. Women 100% suffer under capitalism, there is no argument there, and yes their are definitely women in the brick and mortal of the road. The points I made and the sources I linked are specifically in context to the comment saying, "The road is made out of women more than men". If it is not an equal mix, the statistics I have access to would say that men make up the majority of fatalities under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) You are absolutely diminishing women's contributions and also positioning them as less enslaved by capitalism than men. There are many, many ways that capitalism claims lives that aren't from war or construction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) I completely agree that women have physically labored for much of human history, and also have contributed in equal measure to much of the advances we now take for granted. My comment was not to diminish the suffrage of women under unjust and unequal systems, but to highlight that the majority of fatalities under capitalism are men. Women 100% suffer under capitalism, there is no argument there, and yes their are definitely women in the brick and mortal of the road. The points I made and the sources I linked are specifically in context to the comment saying, "The road is made out of women more than men". If it is not an equal mix, the statistics I have access to would say that men make up the majority of fatalities under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) You are absolutely diminishing women's contributions and also positioning them as less enslaved by capitalism than men. There are many, many ways that capitalism claims lives that aren't from war or construction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) You are absolutely diminishing women's contributions and also positioning them as less enslaved by capitalism than men. There are many, many ways that capitalism claims lives that aren't from war or construction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Alright, while I don't see how I'm diminishing women's contributions that doesn't mean that it is not true. You've made your statement, but the burden of building your argument and coming out on the other end supporting that claim is on you. I've cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. Please attack the pieces of my argument that diminish women's contributions under capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) Iβve cited sources to build my argument, I would expect equal labor if this is to be a conversation build on mutual respect. This isn't a conversation built on mutual respect with how you're framing women here through history. I have no obligation to meet men at this level when they're trying to "logic" their way to discrediting women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child) ...I'm not a man :/ Also, there are people who are upvoting my comments, so it may be at everyone's benefit if you laid out your argument. Unless you have none, which is what I can only assume when you sidestep mutual respect with (checks notes) sexism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago Oof, Iβm sorry. I absolutely made an assumption there. I apologize for misgendering you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago Because women don't die in war. Or fail to receive proper medical treatment due to an establishment that failed to include them in research groups for most of history. Or are victims of domestic violence. And that's just in the western world. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] dkppunk@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago Yet in every hard labor industry the majority of employees are I just want to point out that often women are actively pushed out of spaces like this. Ask any woman who has gone into a male dominated field how she is treated. We are often pushed out because of sexism, misogyny, and sexual harassment. Example: I wanted to be an electrician, I was actively working towards that goal. I overheard how another electrician and the job foreman spoke about my body and the nasty things they would do to me if they had the chance when they thought I couldnβt hear them. It was disgusting and made me unsafe in that environment. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) User found: The reason poor men voted for trump ^^ Edit: Oh of fucking course you think Amber Heard was all victim. Jfc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (1 child) The reason poor men voted for trump "Poor men" didn't vote for Trump. People without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump (men and women alike). Even then, the state you're in and your ethnic/religious persuasion was a stronger casual factor. Trump lost in a landslide with poor black and east-asian men, for instance. And he lost on the margin among poor men in the northeast and west coast. Trump actually won with a majority of white women, against Hillary, Biden, and Kamala. This comic neatly illustrates why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) Gee, I wonder if there's a correlation between not being educated and being poor... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Is βpoor people are poor because theyβre stupidβ really the message you want to put out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Ah yes, correlation. The last stop of the fascist mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (1 child) The reason poor men voted for trump "Poor men" didn't vote for Trump. People without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump (men and women alike). Even then, the state you're in and your ethnic/religious persuasion was a stronger casual factor. Trump lost in a landslide with poor black and east-asian men, for instance. And he lost on the margin among poor men in the northeast and west coast. Trump actually won with a majority of white women, against Hillary, Biden, and Kamala. This comic neatly illustrates why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) Gee, I wonder if there's a correlation between not being educated and being poor... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Is βpoor people are poor because theyβre stupidβ really the message you want to put out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Ah yes, correlation. The last stop of the fascist mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) Gee, I wonder if there's a correlation between not being educated and being poor... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Is βpoor people are poor because theyβre stupidβ really the message you want to put out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Ah yes, correlation. The last stop of the fascist mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Is βpoor people are poor because theyβre stupidβ really the message you want to put out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) You know, it would be really nice if people would think before they post a stupid comment. They're poor because they can't get a good job without an education, not because they're stupid, though you might be an exception. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fuck me for asking if you were intentionally implying poor people are stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) You were not clarifying, you were making a snide comment assuming my position. I responded in kind. I was commenting on someone mentioning that people without college degrees voted disproportionately for Trump. They implied that being poor had little to do with that statement, and I pointed out the obvious correlation between them. Not sure where the confusion is coming from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago Since you apparently know what I was posting and my intent far better than I do I donβt see a reason to continue the conversation. Have a day π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Ah yes, correlation. The last stop of the fascist mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Ah yes, as we all know, correlation is now a useless word that can never be used again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Show proof of causation and stop bringing up correlation like it means the same thing. Braindead takes like yours would see us ban ice cream just because ice cream sales are positively correlated with violent crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child) People being poor because they donβt have a college education is something that needs proof now? Every claim needs to be backed up. Correlation does not equal causation, period permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Fucking lmao. Try getting a six figure income without college or rich parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* Just admit you don't have proof and you're not going to do your due diligence to obtain it. How dare you blather about the importance of education while shitting on one of the first and most important things you learn in college. Correlation does not equal causation. Experiments are required to prove a causal relationship, not just statistics. Get that into your head. End of discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (2 children) really? Women are working the fatal and disgusting physical manual jobs? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children) What else would you describe childbirth as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago (2 children) Tell us where this magical land is where they pay you to have and raise kids. I will move there immediately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not all jobs have salaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) A South Korean firm is offering to pay its workers $75,000 each time they have a baby Hope you like kimchi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not equal to each other? Also raising children should be recognized, but that doesn't necessarily point to a specific sex. Over the last century women didn't quite have the same physical burden men had. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -8 points 1 day ago (2 children) I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isn't getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. Like, I can at least take the carrying of the child for 9 months seriously, but ffs a lady from my nutso church popped a kid out a few hours before Sunday service and she showed up just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Like not as a part of the lifecycle of a mammal, or the job of an obstetrician, but the actual process of giving birth is an activity for hire that is done for lucrative income? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Childbirth is literally referred to as "going into labor". Like, Idk how else you would describe it if not nine months of hard work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Tango@piefed.ca -3 points 1 day ago Prostitution permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children) What else would you describe childbirth as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago (2 children) Tell us where this magical land is where they pay you to have and raise kids. I will move there immediately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not all jobs have salaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) A South Korean firm is offering to pay its workers $75,000 each time they have a baby Hope you like kimchi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not equal to each other? Also raising children should be recognized, but that doesn't necessarily point to a specific sex. Over the last century women didn't quite have the same physical burden men had. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -8 points 1 day ago (2 children) I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isn't getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. Like, I can at least take the carrying of the child for 9 months seriously, but ffs a lady from my nutso church popped a kid out a few hours before Sunday service and she showed up just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Like not as a part of the lifecycle of a mammal, or the job of an obstetrician, but the actual process of giving birth is an activity for hire that is done for lucrative income? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Childbirth is literally referred to as "going into labor". Like, Idk how else you would describe it if not nine months of hard work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago (2 children) Tell us where this magical land is where they pay you to have and raise kids. I will move there immediately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not all jobs have salaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) A South Korean firm is offering to pay its workers $75,000 each time they have a baby Hope you like kimchi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not all jobs have salaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) What's the thing we call jobs you don't have to do and don't get paid for? Oh right, hobbies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I wouldn't call raising children a hobby lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 child) I mean, by definition... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago There are many definitions of a 'job' and parenting easily fits into several of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) A South Korean firm is offering to pay its workers $75,000 each time they have a baby Hope you like kimchi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 child) Well how about that! That's honestly really cool. I do love some me some kimchi, not gonna lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago They're offering that money because they have allowed sexism to such an extent that women don't want to have children there at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (1 child) Not equal to each other? Also raising children should be recognized, but that doesn't necessarily point to a specific sex. Over the last century women didn't quite have the same physical burden men had. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -8 points 1 day ago (2 children) I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isn't getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. Like, I can at least take the carrying of the child for 9 months seriously, but ffs a lady from my nutso church popped a kid out a few hours before Sunday service and she showed up just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -8 points 1 day ago (2 children) I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isn't getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. Like, I can at least take the carrying of the child for 9 months seriously, but ffs a lady from my nutso church popped a kid out a few hours before Sunday service and she showed up just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago I love how people are putting so much emphasis on childBIRTH as if that isnβt getting easier every decade due to scientific advances. I love it when people make it obvious they've never experienced something before but still want to speak like an authority on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago I don't know if I would exactly discount the whole thing. It's certainly gotten better understood but I don't know if it's gotten any easier. The birth of our first child, which had some serious complications was an eye opener for sure, and I'm definitely witness to how badly the whole thing can wreck a woman's body. Your anecdote about the church wife isn't really appropriate here. There are certainly women who are just damn good, for whatever reason, at giving birth to children. Kind of a hidden talent, and more the exception than the rule. I'm just not sure if it all equals an entire adulthood of back breaking labor, or how much that even applies to today's men. Things have changed, obviously. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Like not as a part of the lifecycle of a mammal, or the job of an obstetrician, but the actual process of giving birth is an activity for hire that is done for lucrative income? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Childbirth is literally referred to as "going into labor". Like, Idk how else you would describe it if not nine months of hard work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 child) You would discuss childbirth as a job? Childbirth is literally referred to as "going into labor". Like, Idk how else you would describe it if not nine months of hard work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Sexual reproduction? Women are able to do things for themselves, are you telling me they get nothing out of being a mother? An activity that is difficult can exist without being called a job. Someone better inform the rest of the 120 60 billion mammals on the planet they better clock on and pick up their paycheck for their 9-5 jobs. Also, giving birth isn't a re-ocurring activity one performs for their livelihood, it's an event that someone goes through to achieve something, during a certain period of time under a week (ideally less than a day, but humans be bodying). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 child) Pure gibberish. Even AI doesn't produce shit this bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) ok, you explain what a job is and why giving birth specifically is a job. not "being a home maker", not "obstetrician", giving birth. permalink fedilink source parent