you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Tiangong > ISS and my most anticipated space mission is Chang'e 8, the ISRU test one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Indont know my recent space station lore. But space stations. We need space stations. Once again being this made me like Gundam, I got the feeling from star trek, space is the place. Being a species that can figure out how to live in such a hostile environment and spreading life as we know it, cause we havent seen any other evidence so far, is gonna be necessary for not fucking up earth at this point. I just like holding on to the idea of s future that is cool in at least a bit of my mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Tiangong is the Chinese one, it's way newer and way less jank. It's being used primarily for studying living in space and developing technology for better space living.

    You may remember it as the one with the air fryer barbecue wings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Second paragraphs jogged my memory. That sounds like the exact thing we should be doing. Go far plant flag is such a deeply arrogant approach. Space exploration<Space occupation. We can send fucking robots to look at stuff. There is no reason to send anyone to planets

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    China's approach to lunar exploration is exactly right. They've been building up experience and technology for living in space with Tiangong, communications infrastructure with Queqiao, and navigation and landing experience as well as observation and samples from the lunar surface with Chang'e. By the time they actually send people to the moon (still before Artemis) they'll be going to a site that's already been surveyed and mapped by rovers, with experiments in making fuel and structures from lunar material already underway.

    I wouldn't go so far as to say that there's no reason to ever send anyone to planets, but the go far plant flag mission is a pretty total waste of time, money, and risk. Did you know Apollo only ever put exactly one (1) scientist on the moon, in the very last mission?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I did know the Apollo thing. And yeah, planets are cool, but let's set our sights realistically for a bit. Orbit good. Mars bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It is nowhere near time to try sending humans to Mars. It's a pointless dead poisonous rock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Space in orbit is literally safer cause you can come back home. And I think anyone going there would be reslly disappointed. We have reslly overhyped mars in pop culture. It's not that cool

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Low orbit is also safer because it's still within the magnetosphere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Fr. Let's not fuck around. I am so mad practical space exploration got sidetracked in the infancy of space exploration by the cold war. I could be posting this instead:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ODxb8sLro58&pp=

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments