▲ 213 ▼ ICE Arrests Soar as People With No Criminal Record Are Increasingly Targeted (www.nytimes.com) submitted 13 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments Access options: gift link — registration required. archive.is — not present at time of posting, but should eventually show up. Graphs and charts may not work when it does.
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 41 points 12 hours ago (4 children) People with no criminal record have been widely targeted since the start of expanded ICE operations. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ryper@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago (3 children) It was obvious it would happen. There aren't nearly enough immigrants with a criminal record to meet Trump's targets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] silence7@slrpnk.net [S] 27 points 12 hours ago (2 children) There aren't enough immigrants to meet their targets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago Exactly. And them shooting and killing Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good wasn't an accident. Eventually they were going to arrest and even kill white American citizens. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago* ...by design. Because you always need to keep escalating and broadening the definition of who's not part of the protected in-group. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Naich@piefed.world 2 points 10 hours ago They are also less likely to fight back. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 1 point 9 hours ago There are still a lot of people left that are at risk of voting in an undesirable way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dan1101@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) The Laken Riley Act was one of the early signs of what was to come. It "requires the detention, without bond, of non-citizens who are arrested for, charged with, or admit to committing certain crimes, including theft, burglary, larceny, shoplifting, assault on a law enforcement officer, or any crime resulting in death or serious bodily injury, such as drunk driving." Yes this includes violent criminals, but from my interpretation it also would include someone accused of stealing a candy bar. A lot of Democrats voted for it and I consider them collaborators. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 child) Yes this includes violent criminals, but from my interpretation it also would include someone accused of stealing a candy bar. It's worse. Basically anything while getting (unlawfully) arrested can be constructed as "assault on a law enforcement officer". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 hours ago If the cops give conflicting or confusing directions, that's resisting arrest. If you struggle at all when they throw you against a wall or to the ground, that's assaulting an officer. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 12 hours ago Yeah, even one our major networks tried to broadcast that half the people sent el Salvador in the first wave had no criminal record, and something like 3 people had a ever had a violent criminal act out of them all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jason@discuss.online 1 point 9 hours ago I don't think any of these cosplayers are going to volunteer to go after hang members. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago (3 children) It was obvious it would happen. There aren't nearly enough immigrants with a criminal record to meet Trump's targets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] silence7@slrpnk.net [S] 27 points 12 hours ago (2 children) There aren't enough immigrants to meet their targets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago Exactly. And them shooting and killing Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good wasn't an accident. Eventually they were going to arrest and even kill white American citizens. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago* ...by design. Because you always need to keep escalating and broadening the definition of who's not part of the protected in-group. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Naich@piefed.world 2 points 10 hours ago They are also less likely to fight back. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 1 point 9 hours ago There are still a lot of people left that are at risk of voting in an undesirable way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net [S] 27 points 12 hours ago (2 children) There aren't enough immigrants to meet their targets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago Exactly. And them shooting and killing Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good wasn't an accident. Eventually they were going to arrest and even kill white American citizens. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago* ...by design. Because you always need to keep escalating and broadening the definition of who's not part of the protected in-group. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago Exactly. And them shooting and killing Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good wasn't an accident. Eventually they were going to arrest and even kill white American citizens. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago* ...by design. Because you always need to keep escalating and broadening the definition of who's not part of the protected in-group. The neanderthal thugs they hired just skipped to the last part of the poem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Naich@piefed.world 2 points 10 hours ago They are also less likely to fight back. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 1 point 9 hours ago There are still a lot of people left that are at risk of voting in an undesirable way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) The Laken Riley Act was one of the early signs of what was to come. It "requires the detention, without bond, of non-citizens who are arrested for, charged with, or admit to committing certain crimes, including theft, burglary, larceny, shoplifting, assault on a law enforcement officer, or any crime resulting in death or serious bodily injury, such as drunk driving." Yes this includes violent criminals, but from my interpretation it also would include someone accused of stealing a candy bar. A lot of Democrats voted for it and I consider them collaborators. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 child) Yes this includes violent criminals, but from my interpretation it also would include someone accused of stealing a candy bar. It's worse. Basically anything while getting (unlawfully) arrested can be constructed as "assault on a law enforcement officer". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 hours ago If the cops give conflicting or confusing directions, that's resisting arrest. If you struggle at all when they throw you against a wall or to the ground, that's assaulting an officer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 child) Yes this includes violent criminals, but from my interpretation it also would include someone accused of stealing a candy bar. It's worse. Basically anything while getting (unlawfully) arrested can be constructed as "assault on a law enforcement officer". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 hours ago If the cops give conflicting or confusing directions, that's resisting arrest. If you struggle at all when they throw you against a wall or to the ground, that's assaulting an officer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 hours ago If the cops give conflicting or confusing directions, that's resisting arrest. If you struggle at all when they throw you against a wall or to the ground, that's assaulting an officer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 12 hours ago Yeah, even one our major networks tried to broadcast that half the people sent el Salvador in the first wave had no criminal record, and something like 3 people had a ever had a violent criminal act out of them all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jason@discuss.online 1 point 9 hours ago I don't think any of these cosplayers are going to volunteer to go after hang members. permalink fedilink source parent