you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

That is objectively wrong. It assumes that every election is independent - which they are not. The 'lesser evil' is to lock democrats out of power until they run non-genocidal candidates. The short term sucks, but in the long term it is much much better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 hour ago

    The short term sucks, but in the long term it is much much better.

    Do you mean by the short term sucks that

    • immigrants and US citizens are being murdered and tortured
    • children are being trafficked without consequences
    • we're going to war
    • people are losing jobs fast and a great recession or depression is nigh
    • trump and his posse are stealing so much money and breaking so many laws that no one can keep track
    • he demolished a portion of our icon of america and wrecked the reflecting pool while trying to set up an emperor's arch and ballroom that cost close to a billion dollars
    • he's removing tons of people from medicare and medicaid that will kill people if it already hasn't
    • he removed a lot of our environmental protections and is selling off our public lands to the highest bidder
    • he removed our health protections and now we're seeing a massive push for pro plague diseases
    • he's destroying some of our national cultural and historic monuments because he's racist af
    • etc., etc.,

    To me, you're saying an insane comment. This isn't just a matter of sucking a little, people are dying, being tortured and are broke.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago*

    You have it backwards. If the republicans had no chance of winning, then there can be a split within the Democrats.

    Absolute bullshit if you think the Republicans winning is “lesser of two evils” in any sane universe.

  • source
  • parent