▲ 305 ▼ This homeless character, who doesn't go to the gym and survives on junk food, somehow weights 300lbs of pure muscle (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 week ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (2 children) I find the quality of the writing to be more infuriating, but you're not wrong. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] johsny@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 child) The books are fucking awful, so no surprise the adaptation would be too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (3 children) The best way I've heard it described is like if Sherlock Holmes was written by Tom Clancy. Reacher is not a thinking man's story and comes with the baggage that the story is delivered through the lens of a stereotypical Republican hero, but I had fun with the TV show despite all that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* its like most other similar novels. very shallow and not very in depth, you can tell by the chapter lengths, and its very republican/conservative leaning, as the authors are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago Well that’s a disservice to Tom Clancy, his books took liberties but were fairly well researched. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 point 1 week ago The books are just the same if you take them for what they are; easy to read kiosk literature. permalink fedilink source parent [–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children) The weird thing is that the first 2 seasons were ok. Not great, but ok. this season is very bad. Like they fired the writers and ChatGPT wrote it. The story is nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) I like the new season. I like how its more unknown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago It doesn’t feel obvious to you? permalink fedilink source parent [–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 week ago There's a new season ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] johsny@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 child) The books are fucking awful, so no surprise the adaptation would be too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (3 children) The best way I've heard it described is like if Sherlock Holmes was written by Tom Clancy. Reacher is not a thinking man's story and comes with the baggage that the story is delivered through the lens of a stereotypical Republican hero, but I had fun with the TV show despite all that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* its like most other similar novels. very shallow and not very in depth, you can tell by the chapter lengths, and its very republican/conservative leaning, as the authors are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago Well that’s a disservice to Tom Clancy, his books took liberties but were fairly well researched. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 point 1 week ago The books are just the same if you take them for what they are; easy to read kiosk literature. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (3 children) The best way I've heard it described is like if Sherlock Holmes was written by Tom Clancy. Reacher is not a thinking man's story and comes with the baggage that the story is delivered through the lens of a stereotypical Republican hero, but I had fun with the TV show despite all that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* its like most other similar novels. very shallow and not very in depth, you can tell by the chapter lengths, and its very republican/conservative leaning, as the authors are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago Well that’s a disservice to Tom Clancy, his books took liberties but were fairly well researched. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 point 1 week ago The books are just the same if you take them for what they are; easy to read kiosk literature. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* its like most other similar novels. very shallow and not very in depth, you can tell by the chapter lengths, and its very republican/conservative leaning, as the authors are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago Well that’s a disservice to Tom Clancy, his books took liberties but were fairly well researched. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 point 1 week ago The books are just the same if you take them for what they are; easy to read kiosk literature. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children) The weird thing is that the first 2 seasons were ok. Not great, but ok. this season is very bad. Like they fired the writers and ChatGPT wrote it. The story is nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) I like the new season. I like how its more unknown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago It doesn’t feel obvious to you? permalink fedilink source parent [–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 week ago There's a new season ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) I like the new season. I like how its more unknown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago It doesn’t feel obvious to you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago It doesn’t feel obvious to you? permalink fedilink source parent
