The US Army’s Apache helicopters are crashing at a historically high rate amid a widespread problem with the model’s transmission, according to a CNN analysis of military accident data.

The helicopter type has experienced five major crashes since October, and a deadly mishap earlier this month in Texas killed two soldiers, sparked a wildfire and led the Army to temporarily bar Apache pilots from conducting routine training flights. With that crash, fiscal year 2026 is on pace to be the second worst for Apache flight accidents since a new model of the AH-64 was rolled out in 2011.

The Army announced that the pause in training flights, which exempted units deployed to the Middle East, ended Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 2 days ago (1 child)

Quite the opposite in fact 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 days ago (11 children)

    America sided with the defense in both world wars and Korea. For much of the 20th Century America was the good guys who defended democracy in other countries. Then Nixon and neoliberalism turn America into what it is today. But the US was good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    So good that, for example, in 1954 Eisenhower's CIA overthrew democratically elected Guatemalan president Jacobo Árbenz.

    Let's also not forget the 1953 Iranian coup d'état.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    1954 Eisenhower's CIA overthrew democratically elected Guatemalan president Jacobo Árbenz

    Also Eisenhower's assassination of Patrice Lumumba in the Congo.

    It always cracks me up when people quote his warning about the industrial war complex. It's like a guy who just mugged you then warns you afterwards that the alley you walked down is really dangerous...... Thanks I guess?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Wasn’t that speech essentially an expression of regret and admission that he did the wrong thing? That was always the impression I got anyway, and what gives his words even more weight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    America entered late in both world wars and in both cases only entered to protect US capitalists’ interests. D Day literally only happened because capitalists wanted to occupy Western Europe before the Soviets could liberate everyone.

    In Korea, the US worked to prevent the communists from liberating their country from the hyper capitalists who were oppressing their country. Revolutions don’t happen unless things are very bad, and the US stepped in on the side of very bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    The same fucking familes run things and what is today was a plan from a long time ago. You got gaps son. You got to be some kind of boomer to say some stupid shit like that. Possible a gen X shit eater or a child going through puberty. Not fully developed possibly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    side note... You got anymore of those hard drugs. Whatever you smoking is LOUD. You should share. What you said right there is stupid so I am downvoting the shit out of your stupid ass comment. I can tell you don't read books.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    sided with the defense in both world wars and Korea

    Eh..... Defense doesn't = good guys, especially when considering Korea. The government in South Korea was basically a war crimes machine being driven by an evil dictator.

    Then Nixon and neoliberalism turn America into what it is today. But the US was good.

    So long as you ignore the entirety of the southern hemisphere. It's hard to claim they really cared about democracy when they overthrew several democracies in Africa and centra/south america just to install fascist dictators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The government in South Korea was basically a war crimes machine being driven by an evil dictator.

    So... like the North?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Incomparably worse at the time. The living standard, quality of life, and access to political representation was all much much better in North Korea before the war.

    Before and during the war the South Korean government was responsible for the vast majority of all warcrimes. Starting with the Jeju island uprising, where the South killed anywhere from 40-80k of its own citizens after they organized a general strike. It was one of the main events that precipitated the north invading.

    Around 2-3 million civilians were killed during the Korean war, over 80% were killed by the South Korean/American government.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    You do realize that Native Americans didn’t have the right to vote until the 1970s right? Even in the 20th century America was not a bastion of democracy, and that’s glossing over the Trail of Tears and the whole slavery thing from the previous centuries…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    You've been fed some horseshit dichotomy of good guy vs bad guy when nothing could be further from the truth. The world doesn't work on such simple terms, and america is responsible for destabilizing much of central and south american democracies under the pretense of defending against communism since the end of WW2. The US was never good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago*

    The book of history never closes no war ever ends. No war but the class war. Reform is a time out so the fascist can regroup and try their tyrannical shit over again. All liberal forms of pascification/reform is meant to get you to let down the gaurd just so they can steam roll your ass later on. There has been no human progress at all and this statement will become real to you once the limp dicked cheese burger king drops a nuke of civilians. Your god means nothing to me. Christains are gross. That is all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Korean intervention was to overturn democracy. WW2 European intervention was only to prevent USSR full takeover of Germany. Domino theory is not about proving that nazi scarcity oligarchist economics are the best, but to diminish any country that might want to escape nazi colonialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    What do you mean, "overturn democracy"? South Korea was under authoritarian regime when it was invaded by North Korea + USSR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    South Korean parliamentary elections in 1950 results in 60% of seats for party wanting unification, and 12% for US puppet president's party. President blocked all mandates. Whether North proposals for nationwide elections or unification of parliaments with arrest of Rhee (puppet) were sincere, is deniable. North's attempt to liberate South eventually failed. North/Sung would eventually replace democracy with a Monarchy (Sung's decendants), and questioning his willingness to have taken a pragmatic distribution of power for unification goals is a reasonable western narrative.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    South Korea was a military junta at that time. Can you explain how you feel that is defending democracy?

    Can you also explain how you feel the world wars were about democracy? Democratic levels on both sides of the wars were roughly even

  • source
  • parent