you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 7 hours ago* (3 children)

I have been told I am complaining too much about my company moving to windows 11 and that I need to grow up.

I will then watch those same people slowly but surely start to complain about changes and things not working. I got laughed at today for fighting the updates and windows 11 by a few people who are probably going to be made redundant by this change. (I'm not angry, making people laugh and being a loudmouth idiot is my favourite thing)

I have been in IT support since 2007 and I know that all the change is bad.

My personal computer is on Win10 LTSC IoT and I'm moving to Linux Mint (Thankyou to the people on this forum that recommended it).

Change in tech can be good but not when it's Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and HP making the changes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Yah even "disruption" in tech has been captured by the rich. Nothing shakes up the established order unless it's taking from someone who has less to give to someone who already has too much.

    "Electric Vehicles? I don't know, we need to go very slowly, and then consider how disruptive this technology is to the economy. A lot of big companies might not be able to divest quickly enough...... (etc)"

    then cut to LLMs and it's like

    "AI is here to stay. You can't put the genie back in the bottle (or stop spending billions and billions of dollars desperately pushing the technology into every crevasse). We're literally incapable of acting ethically if it contradicts with short term profits. Business = nature, we're just following an evolutionary maxim — our hands are actually tied! Look, fascism and endless war are just good for business, I don't make the rules (bribes government to make rules for them)......"

    It's actually deplorable, and it's lead to a more impoverished future for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    I moved to Linux Mint 2+ years ago. Zero regrets. 10/10, would recommend. Win 11 getting bloated is what finally drove me there. FWIW, Claude is amazing support for Mint and Linux in general.

    It's not just you, though. There's a post on Hacker News right now about the 170k non-profit orgs just had their data deleted my MS recently. There's a whole comment thread about how MS is no longer a serious company. Silicon valley professionals have lost faith in the company. It's not just you (and me).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

    Oh no, you've triggered my occasional whine about Linux Mint. I was so happy to finally have a Linux distro to play with, twenty years after first wanting to try it after my dad brought home a copy of Linux Format someone left on the bus.

    Linux just doesn't like me. It was okay at first, though I couldn't get my art programs to work (sorry, I love my SAI and psp 7, I don't like krita and always hated gimp). But I could use it for intrewebz and storing my mp3s. I was so proud of my first sudo apt update. But after a while it wouldn't connect to the internet so I can't update it and now it's just gathering dust taking up an entire SSD. I wish I was brave enough to reinstall it or replace it with a different distro, but I'm too scared I'll brick my entire PC.

    That is the end of my occasional whine about Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    As a side note: If you ever try again, I got SAI2 working on Zorin OS out of the box, while I just could not make any version of it work properly on Mint. As far as I know psp is out of the question, though. (And I am still stuck on Windows, since I have not yet found a way, to get the Surface Pro pen work well enough, on any distro.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    That sounds like you ran into a few hardware issues, which may just be bad luck with your machine. Sure, Mint isn't for everyone or every machine. But the vast majority of people gave good luck with it.

    Not sure what your opinions are on AI, but I would guess that a day or so using paid tier Claude would have you safely running some Linux distro on nearly any laptop. I used it to guide me through a home server setup that took a couple hours total. If you're worried about bricking the machine or want the SSD back, it's an easy way to get that, one way or another.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    Change in tech can be good but not when it’s Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and HP making the changes.

    Now, yeah.

    I remember when a new microsoft OS was a great thing that brought wonder and excitement instead of bullshit.

    3.11 to 95 was revolutionary

    Upgrading from 98 to XP was amazing.

    XP to 7 was like being blessed by a digital god.

    7 was truly the pinnacle of OSes. Everything after 7 started to take the crap and fall apart though. 8 with its stupid tablet design for desktop, 10 for its spyware and bullshit, 11 because you've become the product instead of the OS, and also laying the foundations for a restricted, walled garden like apple has.

    I've been on linux for several years now, but god damn do I miss windows 7. It was the peak of operating systems. sleek, stable, usable, and the first OS from microsoft that didnt need regular reformating to maintain stability. It didnt need babying. Things almost never went wrong, and when something did go wrong it was easy to figure out and fix.. I went years between reformats, and those only typically happened because of hardware changes (which often werent necessary, but used as an excuse for digital spring cleaning, basically)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    I remember when a new microsoft OS was a great thing that brought wonder and excitement instead of bullshit.

    Trouble is, what can the OS makers offer these days?

    Apple brought it on themselves by insisting that their platforms had to be updated annually, presumably because it made it easier for them to blacklist older devices more frequently. An unsupported device is basically landfill, right? So you'll have to toss it and buy a new one. Because...reasons.

    But really, what are the functional differences and benefits to the end user of moving from Win10 to Win11? Of moving from macOS Sequoia to Tahoe to Golden Gate? I'm not massively au fait with Windows, but from my experience, the only real difference that could be sold as an upgrade is "Moar Copilot!".

    We're at a point where hardware from five years ago is every bit as functional as hardware released today. So all of the companies have latched onto AI. But users don't really care about AI. And that leaves Microsoft and Apple and Google with... nothing. This is particularly obvious in the mobile space, where they've run out of hardware features to hang a new device off of. Even the cheapest new smartphone has a still/video camera with surprisingly high quality sensors. They can all connect to high speed wifi and cellular networks. They can all do all of the things people need of them. What else can they add?

    But the shareholder value must increase.

    It's exhausting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

    Trouble is, what can the OS makers offer these days?

    Corporate OS makers like Apple and Microsoft?

    Nothing.

    The sad reality is we have hit the point where every OS for the last 15 years have been able to do everything necessary, and would still be able to do everything today if driver and security updates had continued.

    Theres always the need to release a new product, from a corporate profiteering perspective, but there is no longer significant progress in the product itself. There is no revolutionary improvement like you saw from,(using windows as an example) say 3.11 to 95. or 98 to XP, or XP to 7.

    Beyond that we've just kinda gotten minor iterative improvements(to be fair, we used to get iterative improvements as well bad then, with ME and Vista, as examples), along with a lot of creep and spyware because even the big OS makers realize that the OS as a viable, continuing product is coming to an end, and now they are shifting their attentions towards harvesting your data, tracking you, spying on you, and profiling you, so they can sell/lease/etc that data to others.

    The only alternative to this corporate hellscape that exerts ownership over our OS and Computers is to use something like Linux.

    and I know some people might cringe at hearing linux, because there are rabid proselytizers for linux, but as of this moment Linux is the only OS that for the most part lets you use modern computing without the creepware thats invaded modern paid-for OS's.

    The ease of changing over to linux depends a lot on what you do, and may not be viable for everyone of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

    I think you are misremembering how bad XP was on launch. It took a year or two for it to be stable. Windows Vista was an even worse nightmare before we got to 7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    I didnt have many big headaches with XP. In fact, the only headache I recall having was getting some very old games working, but there were workarounds and eventually they ran fine.

    Vista was only a nightmare because vista changed how drivers worked from all previous windows editions, which meant every old legacy device had to have new drivers made and signed for it, which caused major headaches for a lot of people not on the absolute latest and greatest, but that storm did eventually pass.. it should have passed in testing instead in public, which is partly why I didnt mention it, the other part being i never used it on a personal system, but Vista was ultimately a stopgap release due to delays with 7. basically a windows 6.5 if you will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

    I never had 95, my family couldn't afford a PC back then. But getting out families first PC running Windows ME and spending so many afternoons trying to fix it is that got me into IT support.

    Moving to Windows XP was a huge step up and moving to Windows 7 was another step up.

    Microsoft has never ever made an OS as good as Windows 7.

    7 and XP are equal until in XP you try to drag a full screen window and cannot.

    I'm on 10 LTSC IoT and I think (Thanks to people on the Linux sub) I'll be moving to Linux mint Cinnamon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    I agree, windows 7 was the best OS microsoft ever made.. maybe the best OS ever.

    It was the peak, and microsoft could do nothing to improve on it..which is why every OS afterwards has relied on slop and creepware.

  • source
  • parent