you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Steam is OK with porn games. Banks are not. Banks have the power. Steam has to not get debanked.

I fully expect to have to download a patch from the dev when buying a porn game because of the censorship. If its not on Steam or a few other trusted platforms I won't bother paying.

The user adding the "optional" content after purchase make it not Steams problem while getting past bank censorship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I'm only remarking on the irony that porn developers might have an easier time because they can intentionally develop the clean 'steam-version' of their game to pass review without having to declare any contents at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Then why isn't Valve a Bank⸮

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They probably have more cash money than a lot of banks who haven't fully marked the value of their assets to market value since about 2008. I don't actually have a list of who's who, but creative accounting has been an open secret for some time and will likely become fashionable again either this year or next. Unless someone wants a banking crash or (more likely) is just too stupid to hire anyone that can stop one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment