you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (6 children)

what can she appeal?

I suspect she might appeal that the jury was influenced by the media and thus it was unfair

looks like the lawyers are appealing on a lot grounds

ok, retrial. There is so much evidence she will just be convicted again

evidence because she did it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

    There are 7 points she's using. The first one at least it sounds like the judges were almost rolling their eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    another point is that the prosecution presented evidence and she had to refute it ๐Ÿ™„

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Right! I understand the idea of innocent until proven guilty, but it seems reasonable she would have to explain why she had that information about something she had lied to police about. Seems wild. I'm really hoping it all just gets tossed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    it seems she's arguing they used evidence to prove her guilt!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments