you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

another point is that the prosecution presented evidence and she had to refute it ๐Ÿ™„

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Right! I understand the idea of innocent until proven guilty, but it seems reasonable she would have to explain why she had that information about something she had lied to police about. Seems wild. I'm really hoping it all just gets tossed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    it seems she's arguing they used evidence to prove her guilt!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments