you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Jeffries appears to have moved past his primary election unopposed, so yes indeed people should vote for him in November.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Can he drum up sufficient support, though?

    The "idc what happens i'm sure the blues will win somehow" voting block is doing pretty well these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Well right now he's doing the opposite of drumming up support by stating his opposition to near-universally popular policies and attacking the most energized portion of the base.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Supporting him is done by us not him, so how we speak and how we act will decide. Start by downvoting divisive posts like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

    Why is it "divisive" to report on what Hakeem says, but it's not "divisive" for him to say it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Why do you assume we're worse than him?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    People with the capability to make divisive statements. Might help if you take a lap back through the discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm still not following. Where did I even make a comparison? I just asked a question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    You think we dont have to avoid divissive comments because he didn't, butthat logic only works if we're as bad as or worse than he is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The question was about Hakeem making a divisive statement and OP sharing the reporting on it. Reporting on what someone else says is not an additional divisive statement, and downvoting the post for being divisive is just shooting the messenger. That's the point I was making, you lecture the people informing others about what Hakeem said to stop being divisive when it's Hakeem who made the divisive statement and should be lectured. It's the same logical error a lot of liberals make when they blame voters for election losses instead of the candidates for failing to inspire people's vote.

  • source
  • parent