this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
172 points (95.3% liked)
Gaming
19949 readers
9 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The issue isn't screen real estate, but processing power
When you do split screen, you're basically having to render two games at once (a bunch of stuff can be "shared" like physics and such, but you still have to render two PoVs at the very least). This is helped slightly in split screen by the fact that you're rendering a much smaller PoV for each player, with multi-monitor split screen, you lose that edge.
Basically it could totally be done, but only on pretty decent hardware and/or a really efficient game
It’s almost like the pursuit of realistic graphics hamstrings games by making actual fun, useful features like couch co-op impractical
No argument here
It's also that you're rarely going to want to spend that much development time on a feature that only works on one platform out of 2-4.
Add multi-monitor support to consoles!
There's only one HDMI port on a PS5, so until that changes...(also, don't hold your breath).