329
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
329 points (99.1% liked)
THE POLICE PROBLEM
5223 readers
809 users here now
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• r/ACAB
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"improper use of hazard lights" What a joke here in Arkansas. Weekly I see dozens of fools driving down the road with their hazard lights on. The only legal use of them is when you are stopped or if you represent a hazard. You can't convince them its not legal to run down the highway with them on. They read all about it on facebook.
https://tzdarkansas.org/learn-the-law-19/
So I wonder if the lady had them on driving or this guy cited her because she used them legally but he didn't think it applied in that case.
Not that any of this justifies him punching her.
For real. I Uber in central AR and I run across at least 2 a day driving around with their hazards on. I also witness people run red lights in front of cops and see them do jack shit.
It's wild how many drivers put their hazards on while driving through a school zone with the school zone sign lit. Unnecessary and illegal. Even more wild is how often school bus drivers do it and then continue driving the normal speed, way above the 15 mph of the school zone limit. It's such a problem that during my school bus driver classroom training I got yelled at for it, even though I've never done it and wasn't even driving a school bus yet.
Shit, I use my hazards all the time... Traffic up ahead is stopped I'm hitting my hazards so the person behind me knows something is up. Another car stuck on the side of the road and I can't get over; slowdown + hazards. Geese crossing the road, believe it or not, hazards.
My ass is going to jail I guess, being a hardened criminal and all.
No, it's appropriate and legal to use your hazards when you're going at least 10-15 mph slower than the posted speed limit. The problem with school zones is that 15 mph is the posted speed limit when the sign is lit, so there's no reason to have your hazards on there unless you're going 2 mph.
It's racial profiling pure and simple.
The picture makes me think he felt his loins stirring and was sure he could get away with stopping her for no reason, and then some, because ... she's black.