you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

ITT: people saying one thing is better than any other without thinking of context.
If I want to know today's date ISO 8601 isn't a good answer. And if I put stuff in folders by date then DD-MM-YYYY is a real bad way to do it. But MM-DD-YYYY is the worst one no matter the context.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    I became an evangelist for YYYY-MM-DD format once I had to deal with a legal battle that had multiple years of documentary evidence. I sorely regretted my choice of naming files when I had to wade through a heckton of upsetting reminders. It got a lot easier when I renamed everything according to YYYY-MM-DD (and the lawyers probably appreciated it too)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The one you grew up with tends to be your preference. But the usual reason I give for MM-DD-YYYY is it matches how it's said.

    December 25th, 2026

    12-25-2026

    I also know there's no point in arguing about this because, again, my first sentence. It's just team sports stuff, as usual. The only reason why you would bother to argue is if you were trying to convince people to use a standard. But as you pointed out, ISO 8601 already exists. That is the agreed upon standard already. But no one uses it, since we have our preferred systems of date format already ingrained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    FYI it’s not really said like that elsewhere, they say

    “(Friday the) 25th of December, 2026”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    elsewhere, they say
    “(Friday the) 25th of December, 2026”

    As someone from elsewhere: we dropped the "of"

    And no, since I genuinely heard that before, 25th December does not imply that there are 24 other months called December.

  • source
  • parent