166

No Google, Adding Biometrics is the Opposite of Security and Privacy (thelemmy.club)

submitted 16 hours ago by CubitOom@infosec.pub to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Almost any user are much more likely to encounter a situation where their biometrics are forced and not their password. Passing a border for example.

That's valid only for americans. And even then: how many of them are crossing country borders regularly?

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026

166 points (92.3% liked)

Cybersecurity

10375 readers

334 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social