▲ 896 ▼ Scientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming (www.sciencedaily.com) submitted 4 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world 369 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hneerqe@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) How great fixing pollution with more pollution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago 🎵 The solution to pollution is...more pollution? 🎵 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Actually it's kinda good news as it shows we can make direct impact to the climate. Just with a substance actually made for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Don't take it too seriously, there is an effect but it's not that large. And anyways, the change in maritime fuel standards happened in 2020, while this trend goes back to 2015. A geoengineering project is just going to cause more problems, we don't know nearly enough about how the world works, truly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snoons@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Death from overheating the entire earth < Death from near constant acid rain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Acid rain is not that big of a deal, the amount of sulfur over oceans isn't really a problem. Acid rain is only an issue in certain areas. Sulfur emissions aren't global. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Geoengineering is the only thing that can really blunt this at this point... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago Delaying the collapse of civilization by changing the chemistry of the atmosphere further will only serve to hurt the entire ecosystem to allow a few more years of our planet-wide rape. Decarbonizing was the only hope for both human civilization and Earth to survive together. Our choice now is to accept that or possibly kill everything in desperation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago 🎵 The solution to pollution is...more pollution? 🎵 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Actually it's kinda good news as it shows we can make direct impact to the climate. Just with a substance actually made for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Don't take it too seriously, there is an effect but it's not that large. And anyways, the change in maritime fuel standards happened in 2020, while this trend goes back to 2015. A geoengineering project is just going to cause more problems, we don't know nearly enough about how the world works, truly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snoons@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Death from overheating the entire earth < Death from near constant acid rain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Acid rain is not that big of a deal, the amount of sulfur over oceans isn't really a problem. Acid rain is only an issue in certain areas. Sulfur emissions aren't global. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Geoengineering is the only thing that can really blunt this at this point... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago Delaying the collapse of civilization by changing the chemistry of the atmosphere further will only serve to hurt the entire ecosystem to allow a few more years of our planet-wide rape. Decarbonizing was the only hope for both human civilization and Earth to survive together. Our choice now is to accept that or possibly kill everything in desperation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Don't take it too seriously, there is an effect but it's not that large. And anyways, the change in maritime fuel standards happened in 2020, while this trend goes back to 2015. A geoengineering project is just going to cause more problems, we don't know nearly enough about how the world works, truly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snoons@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Death from overheating the entire earth < Death from near constant acid rain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Acid rain is not that big of a deal, the amount of sulfur over oceans isn't really a problem. Acid rain is only an issue in certain areas. Sulfur emissions aren't global. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Geoengineering is the only thing that can really blunt this at this point... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago Delaying the collapse of civilization by changing the chemistry of the atmosphere further will only serve to hurt the entire ecosystem to allow a few more years of our planet-wide rape. Decarbonizing was the only hope for both human civilization and Earth to survive together. Our choice now is to accept that or possibly kill everything in desperation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snoons@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Death from overheating the entire earth < Death from near constant acid rain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Acid rain is not that big of a deal, the amount of sulfur over oceans isn't really a problem. Acid rain is only an issue in certain areas. Sulfur emissions aren't global. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Acid rain is not that big of a deal, the amount of sulfur over oceans isn't really a problem. Acid rain is only an issue in certain areas. Sulfur emissions aren't global. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Geoengineering is the only thing that can really blunt this at this point... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago Delaying the collapse of civilization by changing the chemistry of the atmosphere further will only serve to hurt the entire ecosystem to allow a few more years of our planet-wide rape. Decarbonizing was the only hope for both human civilization and Earth to survive together. Our choice now is to accept that or possibly kill everything in desperation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago Delaying the collapse of civilization by changing the chemistry of the atmosphere further will only serve to hurt the entire ecosystem to allow a few more years of our planet-wide rape. Decarbonizing was the only hope for both human civilization and Earth to survive together. Our choice now is to accept that or possibly kill everything in desperation. permalink fedilink source parent