56
Lemmy or Piefed? (piefed.social)
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by ride@piefed.social to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I’m not new to link aggregators/communities, but new to those outside of Reddit. About a month ago I joined Lemmy and today my curiosity led me to Piefed, although I’ve come across the name before.

My research told me Piefed is developing at a much faster pace than Lemmy, is that true? I like the onboarding of Piefed better, because it allows you to select things you might be interested in as part of the process, which is helpful. Overall, it’s a much more guided approach.

I’ve also gotten to know it doesn’t really matter for the average user which of the platforms one joins. So I’m specifically posting this question on a community on Lemmy through my Piefed account.

I’m based in Europe if that makes a difference, which I believe it doesn’t. Nonetheless I’m happy to read your thoughts. Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 19 points 19 hours ago

Piefed has (had?) some weird opinionated behaviours that to me make it seem worth avoiding https://lemmy.ml/comment/23662293

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I agree about the attitude score he calculates but saying the word stupid is ableism is silly.

Think about it. If you are stupid, and nobody can tell you that, you get a society full of very stupid people.

Humans do stupid things and we should tell eachother. It's fine if someone thinks I'm stupid. It's an opinion, and I want to live in a society where people are allowed to have that opinion.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

I removed the word 'stupid' from the code 3 months ago, the function is now called 'reply_is_low_effort'.

The haters don't bother keeping their propaganda up to date.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think you shouldn't have removed it because saying something is stupid is not ableism.

Anyway, most people like piefed and I think its great with many alternatives. In a project like this you will get many opinions. Listen to the ones that make sense and ignore the ones that are stupid. Yes, I called something stupid. It's not ableism for gods sake.

I think your attitude score is stupid. But that's my opinion and in the end it's up to you, since it's your software. It's fine. Your intension is to create better discussions which is good. How to do it is not so easy.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Abelism or not it took seconds to change so I don't mind.

Attitude has turned out to be a lot less useful than I hoped...

[-] 1984@lemmy.today -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah. I think hacker news has some decent ideas about how to manage these things. You can ask chat gpt about some details to get the idea, but I think its something along the lines of users not being able to affect a discussion with voting until they have some sort of reputation. And I believe that reputation has to come from reactions by the community.

I think if you ask chat gpt about that and have a discussion, some good ideas could surface. They have karma but it's a ladder system where users get more options only after contributing successfully to the community, not just by time.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Interesting, thanks

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

If you want to nitpick you'd be better off replying directly to the comment I linked to.

[-] homes@piefed.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Piefed.world has a different admin and different policies— more open and less controversial ones

[-] ride@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago

You could say the same thing about Lemmy then—lemmy.world is different from lemmy.ml

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

There are some piefed instances that have forked and rolled back the controversial decisions by the dev. Take a look at quokk.au.

[-] homes@piefed.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Lol, that’s certainly true, however, the controversial views of the Lemmy devs and that of Lemmy.ML are a lot more extreme than the piefed dev and that of piefed.social, and as a result, piefed.social, its dev, and the instance overall have a lot less distance between them than lemmy.ml and lemmy.world.

[-] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

Lemmy devs have never ever put their opinions into the codebase..

[-] homes@piefed.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yes. There are both similarities and differences in the comparison.

Thankfully, with piefed, it’s both transparent and simple for admins to disable during setup. Also the difference between piefed.social and all of the other PF instances.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49213 readers
999 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS