782
Why would Elon block a bill banning AI-generated child porn? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world
160 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I haven't looked at this in depth, but some of the scholars I follow have suggested that this law is legally problematic, and there are good arguments to strike it down under the first amendment and section 230.

Section 230 is the federal safe harbor law that shields social media from liability for their users content, provided they take certain reasonable steps to moderate the user content. The federal law will preempt this Minnesota state law if they conflict.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    But in the case of AI, it's company a generated content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    So is adobe liable content created or altered in photoshop? You can see AI as an advanced computing platform that comes with a free "worker". A worker that the user controls and the company can't really.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    If Elon can make his AI spout right wing talking points, he can make it censor itself from making nude images of children, and if he can't, he deserves the full weight of the law against him. This isn't free speech, it's csam, and I don't care what excuses and get out clauses you want to invent, stopping it is right.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent