you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

...this assumes that no one will ever connect LLMs to machinery, or generate code to run machinery (gcode, for example)?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Physical systems are a lot more expensive to train. It's questionable if they can safely finish buildings before some better new form of AI is invented.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Also to some extent, impossible to train. If a person needs to feel the situation or it demands the full dexterity of the hand, then that is not going to be captured in training data. It's why the robots are being tele-operated, yes in part to demonstrate the mechanical bits work, but the tele-operation is the only way they can get training data. If you couldn't use a VR controller to do a task successfully, then they can't even capture the training data needed.

  • source
  • parent