you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5243 readers
60 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Do you think using AI is a good way to study theory? I've been using it as a way to ask questions. For example: answer this from x perspective or what would x author think about this?
In my area of professional expertise I am afraid that the AI hallucinates too much and I am afraid that the same thing will happen when I ask questions to the AI and that I am not realizing it.. at the moment it seems to be going well because I only use it for very specific cases, but perhaps it is because I do not have real expertise in Marxist texts.
i think the most you could use it for is to create study questions for yourself since they can be pretty open-ended, but even that is suspect since again the LLM doesn't know what to test you for (or what you want to test yourself for), it's just a system of stringing together words. that's the most i would use it for, though.
A better approach would be "in x book author discusses this thing, in the current situation I am examining this other thing and applying the theory to get this understanding? is that a correct application of the theory?" would go way better.
LLMs aren't good at being people but they are good at being systems of words.
Hallucinations aren't as big of a concern to me as shallow or skewed readings, imo. Think of all the ways there are to misinterpret Hegel or Marx, and all the reddit comments and YouTube videos and Trotskyist and liberal articles that comprise the training data. I'd be careful asking information-seeking questions.
Some models can probably be useful to help you parse difficult passages, and talk through concepts if you learn better through dialog. Also can find secondary resources if you're using one that can search the internet.
But as long as they're only supplemental to actual theory and you don't get overconfident in your early understanding (which is a problem regardless of LLM usage) I don't think there's much harm. No matter how you study you're gonna have misunderstandings that become refined into understandings through the process of learning and discussion.