37
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -3 points 16 hours ago

What is the point of designing technology for people to use that does not account for common "people problem"s?

I think it's important for people to understand just how large of an issue CSAM is on the internet. This recent article has some numbers: https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/child-abuse-online-statistics/

Basically every platform that allows users to upload arbitrary content has this issue. It doesn't even require presumed anonymity, people share this stuff on Facebook. I think Darknet Diaries Episode 93: KIK also helps show just how prevalent it is.

You can't just handwave CSAM as a pretext. Every file-sharing platform that allows anonymity is rife with it. To operate an anonymous file sharing system is to enable child exploitation.

[-] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You can't have CSAM of a child whose pictures were never uploaded to the internet. Post hoc measures are a law enforcement delusion, more of an aestheticization of a solution than a solution itself. The money they fruitlessly spend on establishing a surveillance apparatus could've been much better spent on programs teaching people about digital literacy and how to be a proper parent. Saying an anonymous file sharing system enables CSAM is equivalent to saying the existence of a printing press enables libel

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
37 points (95.1% liked)

Privacy

4881 readers
443 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS