you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

They just accuse you of withholding evidence. Yay for freedom of speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    @SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml the courts already decided that it was okay to jail people for literal years for not providing a password: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rawls

    and there are more:

    • United States v. Fricosu
    • United States v. Doe (2012)
    • United States v. Kirschner
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Jfc. Next you'll be jailed for not having a phone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That was a court order though. If there is no court order and no warrant, they shouldn’t be snooping through anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    the courts have decided that all ports of entry -- including airports -- are constitution free zones; meaning that the constitution does not apply there.

    as a result most americans -- 2/3rds of them -- live in places where the constitution does not apply to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments