you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 1 month ago (1 child)

If the phone's security prevents them from accessing information, then they have no information. How can they prove there was any information on it to begin with?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They just accuse you of withholding evidence. Yay for freedom of speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    @SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml the courts already decided that it was okay to jail people for literal years for not providing a password: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rawls

    and there are more:

    • United States v. Fricosu
    • United States v. Doe (2012)
    • United States v. Kirschner
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Jfc. Next you'll be jailed for not having a phone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That was a court order though. If there is no court order and no warrant, they shouldn’t be snooping through anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    the courts have decided that all ports of entry -- including airports -- are constitution free zones; meaning that the constitution does not apply there.

    as a result most americans -- 2/3rds of them -- live in places where the constitution does not apply to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments