As part of the devs farewell message on their site, they have included malicious code to make each visitor sends 2,000 requests to the dbzer0 servers in an attempt to DDOS and take the instance offline.
The question I responded to was rather a general one. And I think that seeing all dev-related dramas as "that guy was just fascist all along" is similar to saying "all X are thieves" - a simplification that is easy to choose because it addresses our emotions regarding what has happened but not necessarily always the best explanation
That is when they have a meltdown and quit the project because demand for bug fixes or new features it too much pressure.
That requires self-awareness to ask oneself "maybe I need a break?" and I think such decision can be hard to make due to sunken cost fallacy. I think that with the pressure of the pings about bugs and requests etc, it's easy to get into mindset of "it's either on or off" with nothing in between. Because 5 bugs solved means only 3 other to go.
And the second option is to dig in harder and in this case "curate the feed. All of it. Whatever that means"
I'm not saying that that person did not act out of an agenda. But I can imagine a set of choices that lead to a catastrophic breaking point