37
Name before type: why 'age int' is better than 'int age'
(benhoyt.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
37 points (72.8% liked)
Technology
86651 readers
4047 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't really like type inference, because I think that it makes it more-obnoxious to read code. That being said, I will concede that if you want a lot of static type information
and compilers can do things with more information
it does make for more concise code.
EDIT: Hmm. I was trying to think what would make it better. Maybe I'd be more okay with it if all compilers for languages that did this had a trivial way to just run the type inference step and output code with inferred types present.