you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Advice right up there with “well if you don’t like it, just don’t buy it” and “why don’t you just ignore it?”

As if it’s not allowed to call out shitty behavior when you see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    It isn't shitty behavior to expect people doing work getting paid for the work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Except this pertains to public health and safety.

    Being paid for journalism is one thing, but critical information should always be free and available. While it is available publicly, that isn’t something they inform the reader of.

    Given that NYT makes some articles available to readers freely, this should have been one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    You have conflated "free to the public" and working for free into the argument.

    Yes it should be free to the public. But that requires a taxpayer funded journalism.

    The workers who are already underpaid should not be required to work for free because their work is important. That's incredibly regressive.

  • source
  • parent