144
Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects
(codeberg.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
144 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
86563 readers
3445 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The AI code thing is geared towards vibe coded projects. Using AI to clean it doesn't mean it's vibe coded.
You can argue, it's hard to prove that etc, etc... But you need to remember that they have limited funds/storage and if vibe coders start using that storage with dead-end projects, that can be a problem.
I think they're great for what they're doing, but, truthfully, any "free use" system which has non-zero operating costs for bandwidth and storage is going to have potential problems that can't be waived away with simple policy statements. 8 billion people on this planet, maybe only 80 million coders, maybe only 8 million active in creation of projects that would end up on Codeberg, but AI probably tripled that number to at least 24 million people, and those people (including myself) are making 3-300x larger projects with AI, not only because they can now, but because AI needs that extra documentation to successfully implement larger projects... just like teams of human programmers do, but AI makes it faster with less humans in the loop.
On the "people count" Github cites 180 million "individual users" but, how many of those are work/home/alt/other accounts of the same person?
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with arbitrary numbers pulled out of the air about the amount of "coders" and potential users on codeberg.
A lot of people go to codeberg to get away from big tech.
All their policy is saying is that they don't want vibe coded projects on the platform. They would rather their storage and bandwidth go to real people, not dead-end vibe coded slop projects.
AI generated code is verbose, incredibly verbose, as you stated yourself... and a lot of the time verbose and bad.
This policy allows them to get rid of the worst offenders and point to the policy as their reason.
No matter how wonderful and loved a project (aka business) is, it has expenses. A project like Codeberg's expenses scale with the number of users and how they use the system.
Agreed. However, at the scale they are operating at, I wouldn't be surprised if they end up using a LLM assisted AI implementation to give them short lists of projects to review as potential "worst offenders".