248
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago

Birthright citizenship is more complicated since most people will not have another citizenship, and the UN forbids making people stateless. (Will that stop the U.S., I dunno)

Naturalized citizens may still have their birth citizenship.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While November will be a blood bath no matter what, if it is
(A) anything short of a landmark progressive sweep resulting in a public-mandate supermajority, or this new supermajority fails its mandate to
(B) squash the virulent fascist takeover swiftly, aggressively, and with maximum prejudice and
(C) come out swinging with far-reaching and expeditiously-enforced reformations to every aspect of federal governance…

Then it’s over. The UN can no longer exist in its current form. It can be reborn in a different country, where the idea can live on, but it will require new leadership and charters for its most influential councils.

Because the rollout of the new US dictatorship will then continue, abated by nothing short of a massive bloody revolt or civil war.

Either way the people of the US will have signaled to the rest of the world their commitment to fascism, that it was not a correctable fluke or blip, and that they do in fact yearn for their own and others’ enslavement by the Epstein class.

UN participation by other nations in this new context would not only be unsafe for delegates, it would make a farce of the ideals it was founded upon, just like the US did.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
248 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck The USA

756 readers
292 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS