635
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I discovered this after upgrading our instance yesterday, which also upgraded all frontends to their latest versions as well. After I did, our Tesseract frontend stopped working and I noticed immediately as it's been my primary for a while. Initially I thought it was an API version mismatch, but no, it was much worse.

Someone pointed out that the developer of the frontend added an explicit hidden and unmodifiably blacklist which includes any and all instances to the left of Kissinger. There's a commit which also explains their specious reasoning about our instance specifically, as it seems we've been on their shit list for a bit longer than that.

This instance and its admin staff encourages identity politics, groupthink, mob mentality, and extremist solutions to societal problems. Users who advocate violence are not moderated so long as the admins agree with the target. Caution and critical thinking are advised when interacting with this instance or its users.

When you use tesseract to connect to one blacklisted such instance , you just get a message informing you that Tesseract is "incompatible with that instance" which leads one to think of a technical issue, like an API mismatch, rather than the dev being an opinionated coward.

Isn't it funny how all the software developed by turbolibs, like Piefed and Tesseract, end up with hidden control mechanisms from developers who think they know better than everyone else? That they don't just think they deserve to tell you what you should think, but they should manipulate you to think it? Isn't it funny how libs go on about how bad it is to support lemmy due to the ideology of the devs behind it, and yet lemmy has 0 opinions as a software? It does make one think...

Anyway, I forked - it as one does - and disabled the blacklist, but since this is a massively ideologically compromised software, I'll doubt I'll keep this frontend up after Lemmy 1.0. I think we'll bring up mlmym again now that someone's maintaining it again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

Lol what do they have against archive sites??

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago

It's against copyright and therefore evil per liberal thought processes. Think about the artists and all that tripe.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

Imagine being so liberal you think that news should be gated by paywalls and not freely available for the masses.

It's not that strange when you consider that a lot of liberals lean pretty far right.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

Splitting the Right into two "opposing" colors hasn't done anyone (worth an iota of compassion) any favors, historically, but that doesn't seem to stop the masses from going full Team Spirit. 🤮

[-] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

There's something about the archive.is owner using it to ddos some blog threatening to dox them

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago

Sure, but blocking archive.org? and web.archive.org? That's just weird.

[-] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah that's weird

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Seems rational as an actively preventative solution, NGL. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Don't you want to defend the billionaires who are decaying your standard of living? Think of tHE eCoNomY before speaking next time /s

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
635 points (97.5% liked)

/0

2201 readers
30 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS