778
Firefox capitulates and returns to Twitter
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
778 points (96.2% liked)
Firefox
7371 readers
1153 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
They don't need to be antifascist. That's what I'm saying.
I'm antifascist.
But I do not consider everyone who does not actively do whatever they can to fight fascist (thus they are not antifascist) a fascist. They are just people, neutral, or with other ideology. Maybe they are liberal, maybe they are conservative, maybe they are other thing, IDK. If they do not believe in fascist/nazi ideology they are not that.
I disagree with them giving handjobs to fascist. But that's all, I'm not labeling them as fascist for that. A fascist is someone I believe it would be better if they didn't exist, I don't believe that about THAT MUCH people.
They are a corporation though, they don't have human characteristics. Every move is a deliberate signal to others, because they ultimately care about stock which is tied to public image
I'm glad you don't see their users (who ultimately have no say) as fascists, but you most certainly can judge the actions of the unelected leaders of their daily driver
It's okey to judge them. And to judge them harshly.
I'm just saying that I don't think is ok to label someone a fascist unless we are certain they are indeed fascist.
Once a person/corporation is a fascist, from my point of view they are to be eliminated from society. We cannot share a society with fascist. We cannot share society with Mozilla? I don't think so. I think they are on the group of people I don't agree in everything with, but I can still share a society with them.
For instance Musk is not in than group. He is a fascist, we cannot share society with him. I think there's a difference here between Musk or his companies and Mozilla.