40
submitted 5 days ago by Rojo27@hexbear.net to c/urbanism@hexbear.net

Honestly, I'm just surprised they're even continuing the grift. Then again if all you had to do to make it look like you're doing anything was claim to be adding "stations" with absolutely no infrastructure around it, hell, why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago

could they be bored out? widening a tunnel seems like less earth to move than digging a new tunnel

[-] fox@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

They basically connect a parking lot to a convention center. Doesn't make sense to get a tunnel drilling rig down there when the tunnel doesn't provide much value except whatever the Tesla drivers are paid.

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago

I don't know the logistics, but area (the amount of material to bore out) grows by the square of the radius.

Kinda like how a a large pizza is just a few more inches across than a medium size: when you make the hole just a bit wider (and a proper metro would need more than a bit more width), you end up with a lot more material to move than you might expect.

Maybe the logistics part makes sense in an existing tunnel, but I really think you would just start from scratch.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

23029 readers
102 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS