35

Which do you prefer? I have the option to do both but milling seems to take awfully long and produces a lot of noise and glass fiber dust. It has the benefit of not needing etch resist which is also messy.

Chemical etching with iron chloride is also quite messy. First applying etch resist, removing part of it, etching etc. It is much simpler though and you don't need a CNC machine for this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

I have two laser heads, a 405nm 500mW and 450nm at 10W laser. I don't think either of them are suitable for burning away copper but I can try that. I believe to burn away copper you need a pulsed YAG laser or something like that.

[-] moonlight@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I think you would need to get a fiber laser, but it probably wouldn't need much power.

I have heard of using diode lasers to burn off a mask for etching, though.

[-] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Yes I've tried that as well. It's way better than messing with toner transfer or those etch resist foils/spray.

It also works well for solder mask. If you apply one white layer and a green layer on top of that you can make decent part labels by lasering away only the green top layer.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
35 points (94.9% liked)

Ask Electronics

4214 readers
57 users here now

For questions about component-level electronic circuits, tools and equipment.

Rules

1: Be nice.

2: Be on-topic (eg: Electronic, not electrical).

3: No commercial stuff, buying, selling or valuations.

4: Be safe.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS