34

I have a theory that as AI gets better and better at mimicking humans, the only way to differentiate humans from bots, is to identify the human. This may not even be a conscious development from the company.

For example, Google's Recaptcha might be a big black box of AI models, that gets data about the user and spits out "human" or "bot". These AI models already get a ton of data about the user, like mouse movements, scrolling behavior, and keyboard strokes (afaik Recaptcha tracks all of this, and Cloudflare will soon). What if at some point, Google realizes that the AI has evolved to identify users, tying them to long-standing Google accounts or government IDs, because it's the most effective way to distinguish them from bots?

Google is already releasing the captcha that requires a Google-approved phone. That is also a privacy dead-end. But I wonder if Recaptcha and Cloudflare's new Precursor captcha, are already deanonymizing people.

And even open source projects and websites are starting to adopt Anubis, and complaining about AI contributions and slop. It seems like even the open source world is crawling towards human verification. The future of privacy does not look bright.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] who@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

is to identify the human. This may not even be a conscious development from the company.

Given the reign of surveillance capitalism and rise of fascism, I think it would be naive to believe it's anything else.

[-] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

and training ai (for google) (but I think maybe most people already knew that)

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4824 readers
416 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS