478
submitted 20 hours ago by 9point6@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In 2002, Maine became the first state to implement a statewide laptop program to some grade levels. Then-governor Angus King saw the program as a way to put the internet at the fingertips of more children, who would be able to immerse themselves in information.

By that fall, the Maine Learning Technology Initiative had distributed 17,000 Apple laptops to seventh graders across 243 middle schools. By 2016, those numbers had multiplied to 66,000 laptops and tablets distributed to Maine students.

King’s initial efforts have been mirrored across the country. In 2024, the U.S. spent more than $30 billion putting laptops and tablets in schools. But more than a quarter-century and numerous evolving models of technology later, psychologists and learning experts see a different outcome than the one King intended. Rather than empowering the generation with access to more knowledge, the technology had the opposite effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 76 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I have a degree in computer engineering. I have been coding since the 80’s.

I learn better with pencil and paper. Most people do. Schools need to go back to that. Have computer labs but don’t do everything on computers all damn day.

[-] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 14 hours ago

I'm 23 and got a CS degree last year. When I was in highschool my CS teacher had us writing Java on paper with pencil. At the time I thought it was the stupidest thing but in hindsight there definitely are certain benefits to it. The best CS professor I had in college was also having us do certain things with pencil and paper and he strictly forbid it being done any other way.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Educational studies have backed this up. You learn more when writing than typing and by reading print media than digital. The digital tools should still exist but you also need to use the analog ones.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

I get the writhing because of muscle memory but reading is reading...

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Books are tactile and involve more of your perception.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

That tracks, although I'd compare them with ereaders instead of screens.

[-] michel@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

We are more distractible when reading on digitsl devices though. Perhaps with the exception of dedicated ebook readers.

In addition to fhat I wonder if eInk and actual paper are more conducive to prolonged reading as well, less eye strain

[-] Thorry@feddit.org 13 points 15 hours ago

Agreed! I also have CS degrees and got them before having computers in the classroom was the norm. We had all our exams on pen and paper, you would have to write out a lot of lines of code and make sure it was proper C in the flavor we learnt in that class. Most of our classes were all books, paper and overhead projectors. We did have classes with computers, but they were awful. Our class would be two hours and at about the one hour mark you needed to be sure you were compiling. The compilation could easily take more than 30 mins and if you fucked up or it simply crashed you'd be at the end of the class easily.

I have a masters in Embedded Systems design, so a lot of my studies focused on both the hardware and software. We needed to juggle bits and extract the absolute max out of our very limited hardware. We needed to know about how software could even work on the hardware and why it worked the way it worked. Why hardware shaped the software and vice versa. I feel with the billion abstraction layers these days people are missing a lot of fundamentals about software design.

I also remember half of our classes were various forms of maths. All of those the first year first class started with a variation of: "Forget everything you've learned about maths so far, this is something completely different". And each and every time it was true as well, blew my mind. A lot of those maths I still use very often and I feel like modern programming classes don't focus enough on those.

On the other hand, I'm an old fart and it feels very "Everything was better when I was young". So don't take my opinion too seriously, but it is genuinely how I feel about it.

[-] EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

A core moment of my life was when, late at night, doing homework for assembly class, I finally GOT that "The instruction is the data is the number". I would be surprised if students today have an opportunity to get to that realization.

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

I'm just gonna toss this out there...

You old fucks^1^ are siding with someone non-ironically named "Cooney Horvath" who, btw, is trying to sell books on how best to teach. Hoodwinked I say. Absolutely hoodwinked. "Everyone knows you can't learn math unless you have an abacus!" "They expect to be able to learn spelling and writing without a chalk board tablet? Preposterous!"

^1^ - Used as a term of endearment.

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

“Everyone knows you can’t learn math unless you have an abacus!”

I know this is an exaggeration for emphasis... but people who learn the abacus method are faster and more accurate at basic addition.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world -5 points 7 hours ago

That's just not true. People don't learn with pencil or computer better - a single tool does not shape the learning experience. Sure pencil has positive effects stimulating muscles while learning but it has a billion of negative effects too.

[-] 9bananas@feddit.org 1 points 42 minutes ago

[citation needed]

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
478 points (96.0% liked)

News

38342 readers
2577 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS