618
O hi (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

I'd say the analogy is good. We can look at other countries. There was a time when Rome was all over Europe. But we aren't going to call the Romans in present day England the English? There's hundreds of years of breeding taking place with Saxons, celts, norse, etc.

[-] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I'll raise a counterpoint then: how many independent countries are now known as "China"? The difference is that the Roman Empire fell apart, and everyone kind of reverted to their original culture or became something new. Same thing happened in Greece after the ~~centuries-long Turkish occupation and war crimes~~ complicated events.

The analogy is very messy now and it doesn't make sense anymore ^~😂~^. But I guess the end result is that it's not so simple at which point one nation ends and another begins. Real history is messy and once you actually look into it, it's not a simple thing at all.

In the first place "Greece" wasn't even one thing, it was a messy collection of city-states and alliances that kind of got along sometimes. I think many places in the world was like that back then, actually. Then Alexander the Great happened and a lot of the world was Greece. Then it wasn't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

So yeah. You can make things as complicated or as simple as you feel like.

  • Level 1 complicated: it's a 9000 year old ancient Greek skeleton

  • Level 2: it's an ancient skeleton found in what is now known as Greece

  • Level 3: it's a Pelasgian skeleton

I wouldn't call level 1 "incorrect". I would call it "simplified". People who know Greece didn't exist 9000 years ago will already know the truth. Everyone else won't really care. But I know many people here on Lemmy are "semantics enthusiasts".

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

Level 1 is definitely wrong.

it's a 9000 year old ancient Greek ancestor skeleton would be correct. I get the triviality of arguing over semantics, but this is a science post where the semantics do actually matter, even if they are adjacent to the actual thing

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Details matter. Especially if were going to talk about a reconstruction of a person from a given time period. That 9000k old recreation of a teenager isn't going to look anything like an actual teenager from ancient Greece.

When historians and scientists show recreations of the cavemen in Lascaux cave, they aren't wearing berets, eating baguettes, and no one refers to them as 20k year old French people.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
618 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

20959 readers
1093 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS