22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
22 points (95.8% liked)
Australian Politics
1829 readers
72 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Of course the federal government would reject the recommendations when they're almost entirely state government responsibilities
While that's true, there should be some federal minimums to prevent backsliding in case a bigoted state govt gets voted in.
A very dangerous road to walk
I never thought I'd be defending the coalition but imagine if the coalition federal government (who historically avoid/prevent federal overrides) did this for issues like abortion
I think you touch on a really good point. If the federal government was to use its powers like a cudgel to force compliance of the states it also creates a single point of failure if you have a change of government. We should be looking at building legislation at both the federal and state level synergistically.
Tangentially, look at the damage Roe V Wade has caused by being overturned. From how I've understood it the federal (and some state governments) have basically relied on the supreme court decision instead of building proper legislation to protect abortion.