53
Ubuntu is swapping its time sync tool for a Rust-based version - OMG! Ubuntu
(www.omgubuntu.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
53 points (89.6% liked)
Linux
66232 readers
564 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Okay, and?
I also wondered why this is a big news. Usually those tools are tried and tested over years of development and only run once a day or boot or even less. Don't know if it has that much of an impact.
It's cool and all, kudos to the devs, but idk why it's posted here and an article is written about it.
It's news because despite there already being a number of issues caused by Ubuntu transitioning to poorly done Rust ports common utils, they continue the practise.
Haven’t those issues been found in pre-release software that’s months out from being pushed to the general public?
No, they're in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
LTS! The stablest of the stable releases.
I hate the fact that 30+ years old tools are switched to tools that are barley tasted and bug prone(as it was shown ).
RReligion over substance.
I feel like there's a lot of concern about more and more free software moving over to the MIT license.
I honestly don't know the ins and outs, but it's probably relevant to people concerned about it.
That license allows you to take the source, make changes and keep them to yourself. Which is not in the spirit of open source imho.
Permissive licenses also allow corporations to build off of open source software without giving anything back to public. I don’t see why they’re entitled to profit off the free labor of a community they don’t contribute back to.
This was my understanding, but I really am not in the loop enough to say it with certainty, so appreciate the confirmation. I agree, I think we're seeing from contributions made by people like Valve that there's real value in requiring derivative work to give back to the community it drew from. But again, I'm really not super well informed. I just tend to pick GNU options when available.
We need more GNU projects
You think this is "big" news? An Ubuntu focused blog reporting on what Ubuntu is doing is not exactly the big time.