▲ 667 ▼ ALEX JONES IS DEAD (First episode of The Onion's new weekly InfoWars show) (www.youtube.com) submitted 2 months ago by ZeroCool@piefed.ca to c/theonion@sh.itjust.works 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) People arguing against IP either have never created anything, or have their “creative” endeavours backed by family wealth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) Tbh I agree with the general spirit of what they are saying but IP is obviously a valid legal construct and wishing it wasn't doesn't change that, and I didn't really appreciate being "well aCkshULly"d so I hit the down arrow anyway lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Intellectual property is as real as any other property is: it's all made up by people, but it has the force of social/economic/governmental institutions behind it so it can affect your life. It's just that legal concepts tend to attract discussions by people who can't tell the difference between a descriptive or positive argument (how things are) versus a normative argument (how things should be). permalink fedilink source parent [–] axx@slrpnk.net -4 points 2 months ago (2 children) What the fuck are you even talking about? "Intellectual property" is a term pushed by corporations and their lawyers to lump together very different legal regimes like copyright, trademark, regional indications or patents, under one supposedly common name. Doing this really has the main advantage of making it possible to use the language of theft when talking about things that can be infinitely copied, and therefore can't be stolen. "Stolen IP" makes about as much sense as "unauthorised colour". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Well, next time you create something useful, I hope you share it with everyone for free permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Are you by any chance a sovcit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago Uh, no. What would make you think this? All this has been common knowledge in FOSS circles for ages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) Tbh I agree with the general spirit of what they are saying but IP is obviously a valid legal construct and wishing it wasn't doesn't change that, and I didn't really appreciate being "well aCkshULly"d so I hit the down arrow anyway lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Intellectual property is as real as any other property is: it's all made up by people, but it has the force of social/economic/governmental institutions behind it so it can affect your life. It's just that legal concepts tend to attract discussions by people who can't tell the difference between a descriptive or positive argument (how things are) versus a normative argument (how things should be). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Intellectual property is as real as any other property is: it's all made up by people, but it has the force of social/economic/governmental institutions behind it so it can affect your life. It's just that legal concepts tend to attract discussions by people who can't tell the difference between a descriptive or positive argument (how things are) versus a normative argument (how things should be). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] axx@slrpnk.net -4 points 2 months ago (2 children) What the fuck are you even talking about? "Intellectual property" is a term pushed by corporations and their lawyers to lump together very different legal regimes like copyright, trademark, regional indications or patents, under one supposedly common name. Doing this really has the main advantage of making it possible to use the language of theft when talking about things that can be infinitely copied, and therefore can't be stolen. "Stolen IP" makes about as much sense as "unauthorised colour". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Well, next time you create something useful, I hope you share it with everyone for free permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Are you by any chance a sovcit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago Uh, no. What would make you think this? All this has been common knowledge in FOSS circles for ages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Well, next time you create something useful, I hope you share it with everyone for free permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Are you by any chance a sovcit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago Uh, no. What would make you think this? All this has been common knowledge in FOSS circles for ages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago Uh, no. What would make you think this? All this has been common knowledge in FOSS circles for ages. permalink fedilink source parent